Ingest and chunk
Prepare source documents and their access rules, then index useful passages for search.
[ glossary — ai architecture ]
A plain-English guide to RAG for founders, developers, and product teams evaluating AI chatbots, search, and knowledge systems grounded in their own data.
( how it works )
Prepare source documents and their access rules, then index useful passages for search.
Find candidate passages using keyword, semantic or hybrid search, with permissions enforced.
Ask the model to use the retrieved evidence and provide source references that can be checked.
Use development questions to improve retrieval and prompts, then check quality on a separate evaluation set.
( where it fits )
Answer support questions with your docs, tickets, and product knowledge.
Give employees search over policies, wikis, and operating procedures.
Find answers across manuals, research, legal, and field data with citations.
Supply relevant business information to an agent, with freshness checks and limits on what it may access.
( comparison )
Scroll across to see all columns.
| Approach | How it works | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| RAG | Retrieve source material for the prompt | Large or changing source collections and traceable evidence |
| Fine-tuning | Update model weights on your data | Style, tone, and domain behavior |
| Prompting | Inject knowledge in the prompt context | Small, stable knowledge sets |
( faq )
RAG stands for Retrieval-Augmented Generation. It combines a retrieval step, which finds relevant information, with a generation step, which writes an answer using that information.
Fine-tuning updates the model's weights on your data; RAG retrieves and injects data at query time. RAG is faster to update and easier to trace, while fine-tuning changes style and behavior.
A RAG system prepares and indexes sources, retrieves relevant content, and provides it to a language model. Retrieval may use keyword, semantic or hybrid search. Access controls, source updates and evaluation are also needed for a production system.
Udaan typically scopes RAG systems from $6,000 to $30,000 depending on document volume, retrieval quality, integrations, and agentic features.
Relevant evidence can improve an answer, but poor retrieval or incorrect generation can still produce errors. Evaluate both retrieval and answers, check citations, and define what happens when the sources do not support a response.
Consider RAG when users need answers from a source collection that is too large to include directly in a prompt or changes regularly. First check source quality, access permissions and how answers will be evaluated.